Judicial Review of Procurement


Apart from a law suit for breach of Contract A, what legal attacks can an aggrieved bidder launch against a public sector owner?  Avoiding Contract A is no guarantee that an owner will avoid legal troubles of all sorts.  Alternative attacks are possible, like misrepresentation and negligence.  Crucially, public-sector owners may be subject to judicial review for reasonableness.

In a recent Federal Court decision called Rapiscan, a judge decided to review a CATSA buying decision, despite the fact that no Contract A was created.  In fact, the court decided to intervene, in part, because no Contract A was created, and decided that CATSA’s process was unfair, in part, because no Contract A was created.  Course Description

 Learning Objectives

  • Review recent judicial reviews, with a focus on Rapiscan
  • Identify other alternative attacks, like misrepresentation and negligence
  • Discuss how the risk of judicial review may impact an owner’s decision to avoid Contract A


Contact us to schedule your in-house session.

Email Us

Join Our Newsletter

To stay up-to-date on critical developments, innovations and best practices in the field of procurement and contract management, sign up for our free newsletter featuring The Legal Edge.

You have Successfully Subscribed!